"Do you need fractional meals?
Proper fractional nutrition will be a real torment for many people trying to lose weight. 5-6 or more meals mean 5-6 table settings, frequent cooking and a constant feeling of hunger. It is extremely difficult to stick to this scheme, but what is no less important is that it is often pointless. Take a look at simple practical examples. Let's say we have two identical twins with the same calorie intake. They will eat differently:
5-6 meals with low calorie content - the TEP from each meal will be equal to 50-60 kcal, that is, per day 6x60 = 360 kcal
3 meals with high calorie content - TEP each time will be equal to 110-120 kcal, i.e. 3x120=360 kcal per day
As a result, there will be no differences in terms of TEP and ""spinned up"" metabolism per day. You will spend the same amount of calories on digesting food. Of course, energy surges after fractional meals will be more frequent, because you eat more often, but what's the point? By the end of the day, you will have spent exactly the same amount of energy. Therefore, fractional meals have no advantage over other nutrition plans.
In 2010, researchers tested three large control groups of dieters. The main task was simple - to compare the effectiveness of fractional nutrition with identical caloric content. As it turned out, the system is ineffective for weight loss. In addition, it often causes breakdowns.
Style Summary
If fractional nutrition helps you lose weight, this is the result of a calorie deficit, and not the “magic” division of meals and an increase in their number. If such a diet does not cause discomfort, then you can safely use it, but there will be no acceleration of fat burning. Most people losing weight often break down on fractional nutrition, because small meals cannot suppress the feeling of hunger, leaving you alone with it."
https://www.pr4-articles.com/Articles-of-2024/tablets-diuretic-and-laxative-effect
Proper fractional nutrition will be a real torment for many people trying to lose weight. 5-6 or more meals mean 5-6 table settings, frequent cooking and a constant feeling of hunger. It is extremely difficult to stick to this scheme, but what is no less important is that it is often pointless. Take a look at simple practical examples. Let's say we have two identical twins with the same calorie intake. They will eat differently:
5-6 meals with low calorie content - the TEP from each meal will be equal to 50-60 kcal, that is, per day 6x60 = 360 kcal
3 meals with high calorie content - TEP each time will be equal to 110-120 kcal, i.e. 3x120=360 kcal per day
As a result, there will be no differences in terms of TEP and ""spinned up"" metabolism per day. You will spend the same amount of calories on digesting food. Of course, energy surges after fractional meals will be more frequent, because you eat more often, but what's the point? By the end of the day, you will have spent exactly the same amount of energy. Therefore, fractional meals have no advantage over other nutrition plans.
In 2010, researchers tested three large control groups of dieters. The main task was simple - to compare the effectiveness of fractional nutrition with identical caloric content. As it turned out, the system is ineffective for weight loss. In addition, it often causes breakdowns.
Style Summary
If fractional nutrition helps you lose weight, this is the result of a calorie deficit, and not the “magic” division of meals and an increase in their number. If such a diet does not cause discomfort, then you can safely use it, but there will be no acceleration of fat burning. Most people losing weight often break down on fractional nutrition, because small meals cannot suppress the feeling of hunger, leaving you alone with it."
https://www.pr4-articles.com/Articles-of-2024/tablets-diuretic-and-laxative-effect
"Do you need fractional meals?
Proper fractional nutrition will be a real torment for many people trying to lose weight. 5-6 or more meals mean 5-6 table settings, frequent cooking and a constant feeling of hunger. It is extremely difficult to stick to this scheme, but what is no less important is that it is often pointless. Take a look at simple practical examples. Let's say we have two identical twins with the same calorie intake. They will eat differently:
5-6 meals with low calorie content - the TEP from each meal will be equal to 50-60 kcal, that is, per day 6x60 = 360 kcal
3 meals with high calorie content - TEP each time will be equal to 110-120 kcal, i.e. 3x120=360 kcal per day
As a result, there will be no differences in terms of TEP and ""spinned up"" metabolism per day. You will spend the same amount of calories on digesting food. Of course, energy surges after fractional meals will be more frequent, because you eat more often, but what's the point? By the end of the day, you will have spent exactly the same amount of energy. Therefore, fractional meals have no advantage over other nutrition plans.
In 2010, researchers tested three large control groups of dieters. The main task was simple - to compare the effectiveness of fractional nutrition with identical caloric content. As it turned out, the system is ineffective for weight loss. In addition, it often causes breakdowns.
Style Summary
If fractional nutrition helps you lose weight, this is the result of a calorie deficit, and not the “magic” division of meals and an increase in their number. If such a diet does not cause discomfort, then you can safely use it, but there will be no acceleration of fat burning. Most people losing weight often break down on fractional nutrition, because small meals cannot suppress the feeling of hunger, leaving you alone with it."
https://www.pr4-articles.com/Articles-of-2024/tablets-diuretic-and-laxative-effect
0 Σχόλια
0 Μοιράστηκε
English
Amharic
Arabic
French
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Dutch
Italiano
Russian
Romaian
Portuguese (Brazil)